| Welcome to LawsonTalk. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. After registration, please check your e-mail within 24 hours for an message from us, read it, and reply to it. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Lawson 9.0 Time Accrual | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 6 2009, 04:38 AM (335 Views) | |
| Steve | Oct 6 2009, 04:38 AM Post #1 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We are testing Lawson 9.0 and having problems with running the TA170. 1. We have one employee with over 10,000 prtime records, does anyone have employees with more than 10,000 prtime records and does your ta170 fail to run? 2. With the one employee eliminated the TA170 goes into Needs Recovery with error 153 Subscript out of range, any ideas on what may be causing that? Thanks |
![]() |
|
| Steve | Oct 13 2009, 12:45 PM Post #2 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We found out the real limit is much lower at 6,000 prtime records. Time to purge! |
![]() |
|
| Cindy | Nov 18 2009, 08:04 AM Post #3 |
|
Super Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We modified our TA170 about 5 years ago to only process current records. |
![]() |
|
| area51 | Nov 18 2009, 08:10 AM Post #4 |
|
Super Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know why they can never resolve this issue. They always says it's in a patch but it never is; See KB 557873 to resolve. Had to deal with this for years now. |
![]() |
|
| Steve | Nov 20 2009, 12:13 PM Post #5 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We have one employee with over 10,000 prtime records. When made the change to 9,999 and still had to purge some of his records. |
![]() |
|
| cBreeze | Dec 30 2009, 05:38 AM Post #6 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has anyone tried raising the numeric values in TA170WS from 4 to 5? (for 99999) |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · HR/Payroll · Next Topic » |





![]](http://209.85.48.22/static/1/pip_r.png)



10:21 PM Jul 31